My Theory On The Last Of Us Season 2's Cliffhanger & Why It Worries Me
The Last of Us season 2 cliffhanger hinges on Abby's pivotal role, potentially delivering a gut-wrenching finale that masterfully teases the series' future.
As a massive fan of the games, I've been poring over every single set photo and rumor about The Last of Us season 2, and I think I've cracked it. I have a pretty strong hunch about where the next batch of episodes will leave us hanging, and honestly? It's giving me major anxiety. If I'm right, HBO is walking a super fine line between genius and a potential disaster for the whole series. The game's story is so dense and emotionally brutal that it's gonna need more than one season to tell it right, which means season 2 has to pick the perfect moment to hit pause. And based on what I'm seeing, I'm convinced that moment is going to be one of the most gut-wrenching scenes from The Last of Us Part II.
I'm 99% Sure Season 2 Ends With That Theater Scene
Let's talk about the tea from the set. We've seen photos of Bella Ramsey's Ellie and Young Manzino's Jesse looking all intense, which screams 'Seattle Day 3' to me. The attention to detail is seriously on point. But here's the thing that got my Spidey-senses tingling: Kaitlyn Dever, who's playing Abby, is nowhere to be seen in these shots. That's a huge clue! In the game, Abby's bloody rampage through the theater is the major turning point. It's the moment everything changes. If Dever's big entrance is saved for the very end of the season, then the logical, heartbreaking stopping point is...

Yep. Abby's execution of Jesse. Just typing that gives me chills. In the game, that's where Ellie's quest for revenge hits a wall, and we, as players, are suddenly ripped from her perspective and forced to walk in Abby's shoes. It's a narrative gut-punch that masterfully makes you question who the real villain is. Using it as a season finale cliffhanger is bold, but it's also risky. It means that for the entire second season, we'll only see Abby through Ellie's hate-filled eyes. She'll just be the monster who killed Joel. Period. And that, my friends, is where my worry starts bubbling over.
The Abby Problem: A Cliffhanger That Could Backfire
Let's be real. When I first played Part II, until the game made me switch to Abby, I hated her guts. I think most players did. She was the villain, full stop. It was only by living her story, understanding her loss and her humanity, that my perspective did a complete 180. That transformation is the soul of the game's narrative. But here's the kicker: if season 2 is laser-focused on Ellie's three-day rage-fueled journey through Seattle (which it seems to be), there's literally no room to show Abby's parallel story. We'll get Ellie's pain, Ellie's anger, and Ellie's view of Abby as pure evil.
I just can't imagine Kaitlyn Dever only showing up for Joel's murder and then vanishing until the finale. The showrunners are smarter than that. They'll probably sprinkle in little glimpses of Abby's life, maybe hint at her motivations, to plant seeds for season 3. But they have to be so, so careful. They can't reveal too much, or they ruin the shocking perspective shift. Yet, if they show too little, Abby remains a one-dimensional monster for an entire season of TV. That's a tough balance to strike.
-
The Game's Magic: The brilliance was the immediate switch. Jesse dies, screen fades, and BAM—you're Abby. No time to breathe, no time to protest. You're in it.
-
The Show's Challenge: A cliffhanger means a long wait. Fans will sit with their hatred for Abby for over a year. Will they be willing to come back for a season all about her?
Why This Could Spell Trouble for Season 3 & Beyond
Okay, worst-case scenario time. Let's say season 2 ends with Abby killing Jesse, framing her as the ultimate bad guy, and then we have to wait for season 3. If the show nails making the audience despise her (which, based on the game, it easily can), then what? Season 3 would have to dedicate a huge chunk, if not all, of its runtime to Abby's story.

As a gamer, I'd be thrilled. I know the payoff is worth it. But remember, not everyone watching the show has played the game. For those viewers, season 3 could feel like a bait-and-switch: "Wait, I have to spend a whole season following the person who killed my favorite character and his friend? Pass." The ratings could take a nosedive. In today's TV landscape, that's a real danger that could jeopardize the entire future of the adaptation. The writers can't just rely on game fans knowing what's coming; they have to make the TV-only audience want to take that journey with Abby.
So, what's the solution? Honestly, I'm not sure. The theater cliffhanger is narratively perfect but emotionally risky. The show needs to walk this impossibly thin line:
-
Make Abby a credible threat through Ellie's eyes.
-
Secretly sow tiny, almost invisible seeds of her humanity.
-
Trust the audience to stick around after a brutal cliffhanger.
-
Deliver a season 3 that justifies the wait and the pain.
It's a tall order. I have faith in Craig Mazin and Neil Druckmann, but this is their biggest challenge yet. I'll be tuning in, heart in my throat, ready for the emotional rollercoaster. Here's hoping they stick the landing, because if they do, it could be television history. But man, that 'if' is doing a lot of heavy lifting...